|
Related products
Additional shipping details for 726-38H
Product Dimensions: 14.3 x 21.5 x 5.5 inches ; 7.3 pounds Shipping Weight: 7.3 pounds Shipping: This item can only be shipped to the 48 contiguous states. We regret it cannot be shipped to APO/FPO, Hawaii, Alaska, or Puerto Rico.
|
misleading description
Date: 2010-09-07
Customer Rating:




Overall, it's an ok pan for the price, but it's not 18/10 as described, it's not oven safe up to 550F as described. Cuisinart must have downgraded its quality to cut cost. I returned it.
almost too beautiful to cook with ;)
Date: 2010-09-02
Customer Rating:




Very nice upgrade for the seventeen piece set. My niece and her her new husband like their new cookware very much.
I did not like that it is very light whige and food stick
Date: 2010-07-16
Customer Rating:




I choose this wok because it made of stainless
But because the wok is so light the food stick and it is very hard to clean.
i gave up and got the Gourmet standard stainless 14"wok and i love it.
Very easy to clean and easy to cook. this is the only stainless wok that i found in a reasonable price.
Gourmet Standard 13 Inch Tri-Ply Wok with Rack and Domed Lid
I am realy pleased with it.
Date: 2010-07-12
Customer Rating:




It's a realy big, good quality wok. The only bad thing I can think of is the weight. I would prefer it to be a bit heavier. But for this price I think it's excellent...
good item at a great price
Date: 2010-07-12
Customer Rating:




This wok is pretty good... the quality is very good, the lid does what a lid is supposed to do, and it heats very quickly.
The down side is that the handle is a little too small for such a big wok, it loses heat very quickly (even for a stainless item), an the bottom is too flat. Traditional woks have a round bottom which make them much more useful for manipulating sauces (pool the sauce in the middle to separate from the meat and veggies) and for deep frying. I realize that round bottoms don't fare well on American cook tops, but even a little more roundness would have gone a long way.
However, I got this for thirty three dollars which more than makes up for the shortcomings.